![]() There are 2 Super User seasons in a year, and we monitor the community for new potential Super Users at the end of each season. Super User Season 2 | Contributions Janu– June 30, 2023Ĭurious what a Super User is? Super Users are especially active community members who are eager to help others with their community questions. Super User Season 1 | Contributions J– December 31, 2022 We would like to send these amazing folks a big THANK YOU for their efforts. The Power Platform Super Users have done an amazing job in keeping the Power Platform communities helpful, accurate and responsive. We are excited to kick off the Power Users Super User Program for 2023 - Season 1. We will do our best to address all your requests or questions. If you’d like to hear from a specific community member in an upcoming recording and/or have specific questions for the Power Platform Connections team, please let us know. Power Apps Community Power Automate Community Power Virtual Agents Community Power Pages Community On this special episode of Power Platform Connections, David Warner and Hugo Bernier interview Microsoft Business Applications MVPs Geetha Sivasailam & Chris Piasecki live in Redmond, alongside the latest news, videos, product updates, and community blogs. I see people using an "http request" instead of "grant access". As you have probably guessed, I know very little about Power Automate but trying to figure it out. My first thought was that they didn't have correct permissions for the ".eml" attachment, but I have added access for them to the shared email box. Looking at the permissions for an item, these two flows seem to work, but the user cannot see their item even though they have permission. When a user (or by email address) is set in a column, Flow #2 changes the permissions for the item to the selected user. The attachment is saved with a ".eml" extension. In Flow #1, the list item is created and an attachment of the email is saved into the list. They need to see their items only.įlow #1 creates an item in a list and removes all permissions to the item.įlow #2 changes permissions of the list item to a specific user based on a person column. ![]() The idea is to assign relevant list items to specific users. Different individuals are responsible for addressing these items. Baseball bats and threats to revoke their admin rights may or may not be optional, depending on how you feel.The purpose is to create a list of emails (including attachments which are invoices) that come into a shared email box. Have some quiet words in a corner with the person who did it.If not, after having rebuilt Server A, copy back to it from Server B, this time using xcopy /S/E/C/H/R/K/O/Y (note /0 is here this time). If it's a replacement server you're done.Don't use /O as that will overwrite your restored ACLs. Copy the data from Server A to Server B using xcopy /S/E/C/H/R/K/Y.Establish whether or not you can access the data now.If not, Take Ownership of everything, either through the GUI or the command-line.On Server A, establish whether or not you can access the data.Restore from the last good backup to Server B (making certain that you select the option to restore security when doing so).Let's assume that Server A is the one with screwed up permissions, and Server B is either the replacement or the temporary staging area. There are probably short cuts you can take here, but I prefer the slow and meticulous way as it's less prone to human error. I don't see a way of getting things back to the way they were using only one box, but if you have a second one available, either as a replacement or a temporary staging area (even a PC with a hefty HD will do for temp staging), here's one solution. This is one of the situations where RAID would not help but a good backup can (there are a number of beginning admins who seem to think RAID is a backup in this situation it wouldn't have helped!) Your best bet is to back up user data and wipe the disk and reinstall before copying user data back into the proper folders, then make a backup image of the system. You would have potentially altered permissions and ID's (security ID's) just by adding users and having installed the OS in the first place on the machine because Windows had certain things in the ACL that are specific to the installation. Chances are it would screw up and you'd have a system that would act weird at random times, unless the program in question had a snapshot of what the state of the machine was when it first installed.in which case it's the same as a backup. I've never heard of anything that will "reset" permissions on everything back to a blank slate, unless "restore from backup" counts.Įven if it did, it would need a way to know about who owns what files, as well as registry permissions and other ID information.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |